Join the Neopoet online poetry workshop and community to improve as a writer, meet fellow poets, and showcase your work. Sign up, submit your poetry, and get started.

What Was Once Beautiful

Never before

has an eagle attacked

the nest others built

stick-by-stick

for two-hundred fifty years

imperfect but stable.


 

Never before

has an eagle attacked

and smashed the eggs

that become fledglings

before they learned to fly

and defied eagle intentions.


 

Never before

has an eagle despised

his own nest so much

he tore apart history for fable

and created his own truth

made of his own feathers.


 

Never before

has an eagle devoured

as much as he could of forests

and purple mountains' majesty,

the spacious skies,

and the amber waves of grain.

— W. Barrett Munn, Jul 05, 2026

About This Poem

Style/Type: Free verse

Review Request Direction: What did you think of my title?
How was my language use?
What did you think of the rhythm or pattern or pacing?
How was the beginning/ending of the poem?
Is the internal logic consistent?

Review Request Intensity: I want the raw truth, feel free to knock me on my back

Editing Stage: Polished draft

About the Author

Country/Region: USA

This user supports Neopoet so it can be free to all

More from this author

Critiques

neopoet

neopoet

3 days 4 hours ago

Neopoet AI (premium) [2026-06]

The below is a computer-generated response from Neo, Neopoet’s AI:

The anaphoric structure is the poem's strongest architectural choice. Beginning each stanza with "Never before / has an eagle" builds a sustained rhythm and an accumulating sense of transgression, so that by the fourth stanza the phrase carries the weight of everything that preceded it. This kind of incantatory repetition suits the poem's aim of lament, and the escalation across stanzas—from attacking the nest, to smashing eggs, to despising the nest, to devouring the land—shows a deliberate structural progression rather than a static list.

The central conceit of the eagle turning against its own nest is legible and does real work. The eagle as a national emblem is a recognizable figure, and the image of it destroying what it should protect drives the poem's argument efficiently. The nest "others built / stick-by-stick / for two-hundred fifty years / imperfect but stable" is the most successful passage, because it grounds the abstraction in something tactile: the slow, communal, flawed labor of building conveys more than a direct statement could.

Where the poem asks for more attention is the final stanza. The pivot to phrases drawn from "America the Beautiful"—"purple mountains' majesty," "spacious skies," "amber waves of grain"—shifts the register from the poem's own invented imagery to borrowed, familiar language. Because these phrases are so recognizable, they arrive with their existing associations intact and do less work than the fresh nest imagery earlier. The eagle "devouring" forests and grain also strains the established conceit slightly, since an eagle plausibly attacks a nest but does not consume mountains; the metaphor's internal logic loosens here. One option would be to extend the bird-and-nest vocabulary through to the end rather than switching to landscape, so the closing keeps the concreteness the opening earned.

A smaller point concerns the third stanza's "tore apart history for fable / and created his own truth / made of his own feathers." The phrase "made of his own feathers" is an intriguing image, suggesting self-referential fabrication, but "created his own truth" states the idea plainly just before the image shows it, which slightly blunts the more evocative line. Trusting the feather image to carry the meaning on its own might sharpen the stanza.

The poem knows what it wants to say, and its convictions are clear. The next step is ensuring the imagery in the closing movement is as specific and self-generated as the imagery that opens it.

Please send feedback about Neo (our AI critique system) to our contact form.

Join Neopoet to leave a critique

Neopoet is a free community of poets who critique and support each other's writing.