Join the Neopoet online poetry workshop and community to improve as a writer, meet fellow poets, and showcase your work. Sign up, submit your poetry, and get started.

This poem is part of the contest:

08/26 New Member Contest

(Read More...)

Insidious

The ones who talk in sugar-coated blades

those who hold emotions but never feel their weight

the people who vomit instead of speak

they feed on the gullible and the gullible pay with soul

I stole a sword from their arsenal

The hilt now worn

the blade chipped

I stare the beasts in the eye

They don't see me

Good

I hover this blade against their necks

Naivety speaks

crush the cockroach and they'll call you a hero

Wisdom answers

why crush what you can set free

The masters move like water

because they've drowned

so many times

I am no god

Though how else does one survive

the terrain of unconscious beasts

— Poet.in.plain.sight, Aug 05, 2026

About This Poem

Editing Stage: Polished draft

About the Author

Country/Region: NZL

This user supports Neopoet so it can be free to all

More from this author

Critiques

neopoet

neopoet

1 week 3 days ago

Neopoet AI (premium) [2026-06]

The below is a computer-generated response from Neo, Neopoet’s AI:

The central conceit of this poem—that a speaker steals a weapon from manipulators and turns it back on them—gives the piece a clear spine, and the closing lines carry the most weight. "The masters move like water / because they've drowned / so many times" is the strongest moment here: it earns its metaphor by complicating it, suggesting that fluency in cruelty is itself a mark of past suffering rather than mere villainy. That turn adds moral texture the opening lines do not yet reach.

The imagery of the stolen sword is developed with care. "The hilt now worn / the blade chipped" does real work, implying the speaker has used this weapon long enough to be shaped by it, which pays off against the later admission "I am no god." The exchange between "Naivety" and "Wisdom" also sets up the poem's genuine question—whether to destroy or release—and the line "why crush what you can set free" lands the dilemma cleanly.

Some of the opening images strain toward force rather than achieving it. "Sugar-coated blades" is a familiar figure, and "vomit instead of speak" reaches for disgust in a way that competes with, rather than deepens, the more controlled sword imagery that follows. Because the poem's best effects are precise and restrained, these early lines might be revised toward the same specificity—one concrete instance of the manipulators' speech would do more than the accumulated abstractions of "those who hold emotions but never feel their weight."

The phrase "the gullible pay with soul" also arrives before the poem has established what that costs, so it reads as assertion rather than something felt. Consider whether the poem can dramatize a single transaction rather than naming its category. The final question, "how else does one survive / the terrain of unconscious beasts," is compelling, but "unconscious beasts" repeats the "beasts" of eight lines earlier without adding to it; a fresh image in one of those two places would let each stand on its own.

One small structural note: the isolated "Good" is effective as a cold, private aside, and the poem might trust more of these short lines to do that quiet work instead of relying on the heavier declarations elsewhere.

Please send feedback about Neo (our AI critique system) to our contact form.

Join Neopoet to leave a critique

Neopoet is a free community of poets who critique and support each other's writing.