Join the Neopoet online poetry workshop and community to improve as a writer, meet fellow poets, and showcase your work. Sign up, submit your poetry, and get started.
Sensory Deprivation
Sensory Deprivation
If I just close my eyes,
If I just cover my ears,
If I stop going outside,
Will it erase the fears?
If I can’t see the blood,
That stains my hands…
Is it only warm water?
If we all just pretend?
If the meat was for cheap,
Would you eat your friend?
Betrayal of your humanity,
For a few dollars to spend.
Was the silence so deafening,
That you don’t hear the bombs?
Would you close all your blinds?
You’ll act as if nothing is wrong?
Will you keep your ears covered?
Would you muffle their screams?
Would you ignore all the agony,
Only to stay trapped in dreams?
Would you dig your mom’s grave?
Would you pave your love’s tomb?
Will you use the ashes of children,
For the flowers to take their bloom?
About This Poem
Last Few Words: I rarely ever revise my stuff. So there might be mistakes.
Style/Type: Free verse
Review Request Direction:
What did you think of my title?
How was my language use?
How does this theme appeal to you?
Review Request Intensity: I appreciate moderate constructive criticism
Editing Stage: Draft
Critiques
neopoet
14 hours 22 min ago
Neopoet AI (premium) [2026-06]
The below is a computer-generated response from Neo, Neopoet’s AI:
The poem builds its argument through a sustained series of rhetorical questions, and this structural choice is the piece's clearest strength. The opening stanza establishes a controlled, almost quiet register — the repetition of "If I just" creates a sense of someone bargaining with themselves — before the poem widens outward to indict a collective "you." That shift from the private "I" to the accusatory "you" is a deliberate escalation, and it mostly works to raise the stakes.
The central conceit of sensory deprivation as willful moral blindness is a strong organizing idea. The imagery of covering ears against bombs and closing blinds against wrongdoing gives the abstract theme of complicity something concrete to sit on. The final stanza reaches for the poem's most striking images — the grave, the tomb, the ashes feeding flowers — and the closing couplet in particular lands with force because it turns the machinery of denial into something generative and horrifying at once.
Where the poem could sharpen is in the consistency of its imagery. The third stanza's turn to cannibalism ("Would you eat your friend?") introduces a metaphor that sits at a different register from the bombs, screams, and graves surrounding it, and the leap can distract rather than deepen. Consider whether that image earns its place among the others, or whether a figure drawn from the same field of war and witnessing would build the argument more cohesively.
The rhythm also wavers in a few spots. Lines like "Was the silences so deafening" carry a grammatical slip ("was" for "were") that pulls attention from the meaning, and several lines vary in syllable count enough to unsettle the otherwise steady quatrain-and-rhyme structure the poem sets up. Reading the stanzas aloud and smoothing the metrical outliers would let the repetitions do their hypnotic work without interruption.
One further suggestion concerns the ellipsis and the reliance on stacked questions. Because nearly every line is interrogative, the individual questions begin to lose their edge by the later stanzas. Allowing one or two declarative lines to break the pattern — a flat statement amid the questions — could restore the pressure the accumulation is aiming for.
Please send feedback about Neo (our AI critique system) to our contact form.
Join Neopoet to leave a critique
Neopoet is a free community of poets who critique and support each other's writing.