Join the Neopoet online poetry workshop and community to improve as a writer, meet fellow poets, and showcase your work. Sign up, submit your poetry, and get started.

Where Once Had Glanced Infinity


Where Once Had Glanced  Infinity

We lost our lives when we lost space.
Dear God how could we lose that race?
The nation cried the day he died
But we fulfilled his dream.

And now a lifetime's passed away
And we sought solace in the day
When once again we could begin
To live, to strive, to dream.

But as the years have atrophied
We've lost the drive, we've lost the need,
And now we dwell within the shell
Of pompous apathy.

The ticks have worn away the clocks
And dashed our hopes on fetid rocks
While we embrace the cold disgrace
Of dull monotony.


Motivation and Focus.

This was started in November of 2008 and had a subject matter of the 40th anniversary of Apollo 8.  I set it aside and never really returned to it either through a lack of inspiration or a result of the personal upheaval in my life at the time, my wife of 18 years having just left me a few months before.

Least we get too morose, the wife leaving me was not a bad thing, just a thing with which I had to deal at the time as the custodial parent of a 16 year old son who was doing his level best not to pass the 10th grade.  Yes Gareth, I am talking about you.

I was reorganising things a few months ago and classifying work I had started and set aside as candidates for Suck Free Poetry Vol 3 and I have to be honest, I did not recognise this piece at first.

It has an interesting rhyme scheme and depends on a declining meter and at first I had written only two stanzas so as I reviewed it over the last few months I had to decide if it was going to be grouped as couplets stanza or three or just have all the stanzas end with the same type of trimeter rhyme pattern.

In the end I broke things down in my mind and found symmetry in the following meter and rhyme:

Tetrameter A
Tetrameter A
Tetrameter BB
Trimeter C

Tetrameter D
Tetrameter D
Tetrameter EE
Trimeter C

Since pairing was the underlying structure holding the overall structure in place, pairing the stanzas seemed to fit.

And here, with the Shuttle program winding down and a lack of political will to get off this ball of rock in any sustainable fashion I am seeing yet another of the promises made or implied to me in my youth fail and wither.

I am a product of the 1960s.  I grew up with hope and progress and social upheaval and have, nearly 50 years later, discovered that while we continue to reap the benefits the space program inspired, we as a culture have ceased to dream of anything but winning the lottery.

Perhaps when China sets up colonies on the Moon and Mars folks will get the whole fear-based motivation thing going again. 

Talk about a consolation prize.

— Pugilist, Jun 02, 2010

About This Poem

About the Author

Region, Country: Jacksonville area, FL, USA, USA

Favorite Poets: Keats, Kipling, Carroll, Yeats, Tolkien, Shakespeare

This user supports Neopoet so it can be free to all

More from this author

Critiques

Tam the Chanter

Tam the Chanter

16 years ago

flow

Jonathan, I like the sentiments and general word choice. Again it's probably a dialect thing but I choke a bit on lines 3 and 15. I read 3 better as " A nation crying with his dying" and 15 I cannot think of a way to flow this line to my old Scots lugs (ears). Hope it helps Ian
Jonathan Moore

Jonathan Moore

16 years ago

Still looking at line 3

But your observation of L15 prompted me to revisit and recast the stanza. I had realised I'd neglected to smooth out the punctuation and intended only to do this but as I read L15 and the last stanza, it felt contrived so I reached back to the original idea of having clock refer to time rather than blatantly stating time and, I believe, this smooths out that stanza. Your thoughts are appreciated. --Jonathan Annoying the world, one person at a time (Group discounts available)
Kailashana

Kailashana

16 years ago

I’m curious, Jonathan,

I'm curious, Jonathan, would you consider rewriting and incorporating the first two and the last two? We lost our lives when we lost That race for space, Dear God how our nation cried And now a lifetime’s passed away And we seek solace in this day When once again we begin To live, to strive, to dream Though the years have atrophied, Lost our drive and dwell within our shell Of pompous apathy. Our ticks have worn away our time Our bells no longer strike nor chime Silence compels stagnant farewells and dull monotony. I know none of it is in your rhyming scheme... and you'd have to fix it to rhyme as you want, but what ya think for how it speaks in the present? ~ The voices are a bit different between the first two and the second two stanzas. The last two seem to have more fervor, life. For me, poetry is a living thing and is subject to the immediacy of my internalizations, rationalizations on any theme, new or old. ~A "Just as what you dream is your own and no one else can observe it, so the world you see is your own." ~ Nisargadatta
Jonathan Moore

Jonathan Moore

16 years ago

Interesting perspective

And the preference may come down to speech patterns and predilection. I spent a lot of time in the southern regions of the US and so my speech pattern is slower and more deliberate than is the norm for the area in which I currently reside, Philly, PA. When I visit my dad in Tennessee or my brother in North Florida, my speech idiosyncrasies are more in tune with the general public and therefore my interaction smoother. Why bring this up? Because I am suspecting that a lot of how we approach poetry has to do with how we are comfortable in speaking and so what may seem natural to one will seem stilted and unclear to the other. No just you and I but people in general. For me, the structure you've defined feels choppy and foreign to my way of speaking and because of this I'm stumbling all over the place when I try to read it. It might be me reading it poorly or not picking up the punctuation cues correctly or any number of other issues but the base fact is that it's not the style in which I write or speak and so I struggle with it. But I do appreciate your perspective, commentary, and time. --Jonathan Annoying the world, one person at a time (Group discounts available)
A

anonymous1

16 years ago

How I'm reading it...

Well, at first, I didn't find the meter in the first stanza flowed as well as the others, but then, I read it like this and it helped: (the dash marks the stressed syllable in each foot) We -lost / our -lives / when -we / lost -space, -Dear God / -how we / -lost that / -race. The -na / tion -cried / -when he / -died But -we / ful -filled / his -dream. So, are not the second and third lines trimeter + one? I'm just using this poem to deepen my understanding of meter and feet and so on... I realize you've explained this to death and, believe me, I've studied it to death too. I feel I'm on the cusp of grasping it. Thanks for your help. Lisa
Jonathan Moore

Jonathan Moore

16 years ago

Actually, you've spotted an error in L2 & L3

I'm not sure how I managed it, seeing as I thought I had drilled through this but the fact is L2 & L3 are a syllable short and explains why Ian had a tough time with it. Let me take a look at it and fix it but to answer your questions/point, yes, L2 & L3 are currently trimeter+1 but they are supposed to be tetrameter. --Jonathan Annoying the world, one person at a time (Group discounts available)
A

anonymous1

16 years ago

Ahhhh...

How perfectly it reads now. I'm beginning to get the hang of it and have to admit, I do enjoy it. Lisa