Join the Neopoet online poetry workshop and community to improve as a writer, meet fellow poets, and showcase your work. Sign up, submit your poetry, and get started.

Parlor mutter

 

 

Some mystic thought I find instructive, taken lightly, Friend.

But grave conviction murders thought and makes a man a pious fraud.

Where superstition reigns pervasive all words serve some static end

And all that fails to publish custom somehow seems to threaten God.

 

I tamper not with your beliefs, Sir, prithee tamper not with mine

I too believe in ghostly objects, hold taboos, and pray for aid

And when I see a likely convert I, too, serve her words and wine

(Alas I am the hypocrite, my interest is on the maid).

 

My mythos come in waves of image, omens, signal from a bird

It does not lend itself to scripture; hard enough to read myself

The incomplete thing, half-perhaps done, lacking structure, lacking word.

I have no books of worthy morals bound in hide upon my shelf.

 

I feel my fortune, fear demise, and weep when Evil wins its cause.

Dismayed by hate, I hate right back, and wonder how I found the heat

To move so hard, with such great zeal, with no regard for written laws

The labeled shadows (not yet mentioned) filled my hands and moved my feet

 

That list of shadows, nearly demons, runs for pages, endless list

I see love/hate, and right and wrong, and cause and will, then look away.

With motive blind reflection breeds an impulse that I can resist.

The Beast is strong, and Thought is frail, but mist does not long bar my way: 

 

A man can learn to hobble fictions, practice riding useful fakes,

Or swim about in sweet conventions, frolic under custom's skirt,

For once you see how thin they be, your pity holds these feeble flakes

Aloft in mind, secure against the killing contact with the dirt.

 

So why embrace a vicious spook? What sacrifice might I enjoy?

I seek instead a worthy nothing, something nice, not too profound

Some concept that serves well the body, felt in mind though as my toy.

In morning fog the metaphor, the vapor rises from the ground.

 

As smoke with automatic grace evades the waving hand

As strollers step above the surf to walk on firm dry sand

So close above the fertile real a virile abstract hovers

A glimpse I see, how can that be? Might real and false be lovers?

 


About This Poem

About the Author

More from this author

Comments

Jonathan Moore

Jonathan Moore

18 years ago

Interesting concept

In all the right ways. I thoroughly enjoyed the subject matter and the interplay of "I know this might not be 100% consistent, too damn bad." There was a line that gave me a line gave me a stumble: ---------------------------------------------- The incomplete thing, half-perhaps done, lacking structure, lacking word. ---------------------------------------------- And I noticed that the first line has but 14 syllables while the rest of the lines, save the last stanza, have 16. Was that intentional? It does not really detract from the poem but I do wonder about things like that. Lastly, I know it's an ABAB with a finish of AABB. I don't know if it was a function of my read but I found myself feeling I was always a beat behind when it came to the pattern as I was reading it. When I recited it aloud it was smoother but I believe the length of the lines gave me pause mostly because I write in lines half as long and my mind was trying to impose a pattern over your own. I will have to let this sit for a day or so and come back to it because the second time I recited it I started to get a better feel for the pattern. But aside from the line mentioned above, which I am fairly certain is a product of my read, I don't have any suggestions at this moment. --Jonathan Annoying the world, one person at a time (Group discounts available)
S

Skumpfsklub

18 years ago

About that short line

I DID do the syllable count, and decided to let the anomaly stay, reckoning that it 'echoed' a stumbling-into-rhythm that was meet with the mood. It's I hope evident enough that this is a kind of reply to an unseen proselyte being entertained by a 'dusty (and rather pompous) old gentleman in his parlor.' The quasi-argument offered against embracing [deism of some sort] is 'the incomplete thing, half-perhaps done, [etc.]', and so is the speaker, who must 'read himself' as one of many (putative) 'omens' . The line that bugs me is 'The labeled shadows, etc' It creates a loose end (the unlabeled shadows) that I'm aware of now--but I wasn't then. This was a candid snapshot of my moral philosophy at the time of writing, which I wrapped around a single 'nice line' that had come to mind. That is, there is exactly ONE line that carries the 'poetic vision' I had before I started mucking around with moral philosophy, using a bright and shiny new poetic toy. Everything else is a poeticized translation of some very muddy thinking--that is only slightly less murky now. The length of the lines was a deliberate stretch, testing the limits of practical line length. Reciting it leaves me breathless. I didn't know about 'common form' then. (It's a couple of years old). As a challenge: Which was the line I wrote first? If anyone can be expected to spot it, you can. Thanks for doing a good reading. I know its awkwardnesses and imprecisions are off-putting to many. Definitions are wanted--and not found here. All vague gestures at what is barely seen. I'm grateful for your toleration and understanding of that.
Jonathan Moore

Jonathan Moore

18 years ago

A challenge

As for finding the first line, it raises an interesting supposition on my part. I'm guessing that, at times, the first line you write need not be the first line of the poem. This supposition is based on the fact that I often write a middle or end line first and then build around it either through design or circumstance. For the first line I have three (3) candidates: 1) I tamper not with your beliefs, Sir, prithee tamper not with mine 2) A man can learn to hobble fictions, practice riding useful fakes, 3) So why embrace a vicious spook? What sacrifice might I enjoy? but have to ultimately go with #3 mostly because it is the most direct and most complete of the thoughts. There's also the clean break into 8-counts and, most important to me, least "nice" comment. Here's where I have to explain putting the word nice in quotes. Without fail, anyone who has told me I am not nice has really meant: "Why won't you let me take advantage of you?" So I shortcut folks by telling them: "I'm polite, not nice. Expect nothing more." On another read, searching for that 1st line - which I have so convinced myself I have gotten right that I will either be confirmed in my wondrous ability or be tempted to construct some bizarre explanation to explain my error - I find myself questioning: ------------------------------------------------------------ My mythos come in waves of image, omens, signal from a bird ------------------------------------------------------------ Should signal be plural? I ask since 'wave' and 'omen' are. Now as far as constructing the bizarre explanation thing, if I'm wrong, I'll just have to be wrong. Final question for now and not about your writing. I notice you'd been San Diego Afghanistan and now are San Diego, US. Did you just return from a tour? I ask since I have a friend in San Diego who is Army Reserve and recently did an Afghanistan tour. --Jonathan Annoying the world, one person at a time (Group discounts available)
S

Skumpfsklub

18 years ago

You're amazing, Holmes!

But wrong. Not by very damn much, though. Your arguments almost compel me to amend my memory. I'll pass the answer in a message--unless you want to take another stab at it. I'd like to leave 'the guessing game' here for others to play--if I ever see another review of this piece.