Join the Neopoet online poetry workshop and community to improve as a writer, meet fellow poets, and showcase your work. Sign up, submit your poetry, and get started.
Jun 10, 2026
⭐ View statistics (Premium feature)
Teardrop
A single teardrop rolls down her cheek.
It holds a thousand words, none she can speak.
She takes a breath, swallows hard, wipes the tear away.
The flood she holds inside will keep for another day.
How long for, she doesn’t know,
but when it comes, you’ll see
a raging torrent of waves flowing out of… me
What a frightening day that will be.
— Misspoetrynportraits, Jun 10, 2026
Share this poem
About This Poem
Review Request Intensity: I want the raw truth, feel free to knock me on my back
Editing Stage: Final polish
Critiques
neopoet
1 week 1 day ago
Neopoet AI (premium) [2026-06]
The below is a computer-generated response from Neo, Neopoet’s AI:
The poem builds its emotional weight around a single controlling image — water — and the progression from a contained teardrop to a "raging torrent of waves" gives the piece a clear arc. The restraint in the opening lines works well: the gesture of swallowing hard and wiping the tear away is a concrete, recognizable action that conveys suppression without naming the emotion outright, which is the stronger choice. The line "It holds a thousand words, but none she can speak" pairs neatly with that physical restraint, and the contrast between silence now and the flood later is the poem's most promising tension.
One concrete issue is the shift in pronoun midway through. The poem begins in the third person — "her cheek," "she takes a breath" — and then moves to "flowing out of me," with "me" emphasized by underlining. If the speaker and the woman are the same person, that shift could be powerful, a moment where the distanced observer admits the feeling is her own. But as written the transition is abrupt and reads more like an oversight than a deliberate turn. Clarifying that relationship, or staging the shift more visibly so the reader understands it as intentional, would let that move land with the force it seems to want.
The phrase "raging torrent of waves" leans on three near-synonymous water words at once, which dilutes rather than intensifies the image. A single sharper noun would carry more force than the accumulation. Similarly, "what a frightening day that will be" tells the reader how to feel about the coming flood; the imagery of the torrent could be trusted to suggest that dread on its own. Consider whether the final line is doing work the earlier images have not already done.
The metaphor of held water that will eventually break is familiar territory, so the freshness will depend on the specific details — what exactly the thousand words are, what the flood is made of. Grounding the abstraction in one or two concrete particulars unique to this speaker would distinguish the poem from the general shape of the idea.
Please send feedback about Neo (our AI critique system) to our contact form.
Tink
1 week ago
Howdy! I'm Tink
Welcome to Neopoet!
I really enjoyed this piece! I stumbled over a couple of lines, where the rhyming stopped and then started again.
And this is just me, i am a stickler with the words "but" and "and" for me, the word "but" cancels or voids what came before it, most of the time. The word "and" tends to be used as a filler word, like "um". most of the time.
If I may...
A single teardrop rolls down her cheek.
It holds a thousand words; none that she can speak.
also the last line...
What a frightening day that will be…
to me, reads better with more impact.
I, also, am not a big fan of fluff & fillers. I would love to see you go back through to see if you can tighten this piece up.
This is only my opinion. Take from it what you can use and leave the rest.
I look forward to seeing more of your work. Thank you for sharing!
Live, Laugh & Love,
(and Don't forget to Write!!)
Yours in Ink,
Tink
Misspoetrynportraits
1 week ago
Corrections
Thank you Tink for your help. I hadn’t thought about taking the ‘but’ out but you are right, it does work better. And I agree with removing the ‘and’ in the last sentence. I have been tousling with whether I should remove it or not and should have gone with my intuition on that one.
Thanks again for your help xx
Join Neopoet to leave a critique
Neopoet is a free community of poets who critique and support each other's writing.